Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada
(le français suit)
JUDGMENTS IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
February 5, 2015
For immediate release
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgment in the following applications for leave to appeal.
JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
Le 5 février 2015
Pour diffusion immédiate
OTTAWA – La Cour suprême du Canada a déposé aujourd’hui auprès du registraire les jugements dans les demandes d’autorisation d’appel qui suivent.
APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE / DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION :
Summaries of these cases are available at http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/news/en/item/4813/index.do.
Les sommaires des causes peuvent être consultés à l'adresse suivante : http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/news/fr/item/4813/index.do
GRANTED WITHOUT COSTS / ACCORDÉES SANS DÉPENS
Her Majesty the Queen v. Hamidreza Safarzadeh-Markhali (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (36162)
Coram: McLachlin / Wagner / Gascon
****
In the Matter of an Application for Warrants to Sections 12 and 21 of the Canadian Security Intelligence Services Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-23 (F.C.) (Civil) (By leave) (36107)
Coram: McLachlin / Wagner / Gascon
****
DISMISSED WITH COSTS / REJETÉES AVEC DÉPENS
Gerry Miller v. Convergys CMG Canada Limited Partnership et al. (B.C.) (Civil) (By Leave) (36092)
Coram: McLachlin / Wagner / Gascon
****
Dixon Ormiston, by his Litigation Guardian, Scott Ormiston v. Insurance Corporation of British Columbia et al. (B.C.) (Civil) (By Leave) (36067)
Coram: Rothstein / Cromwell / Moldaver
****
Thomas Percy Tupper v. Attorney General of Nova Scotia Representing Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova Scotia et al. (N.S.) (Civil) (By Leave) (36181)
(The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. /
La requête en prorogation du délai de signification et de dépôt de la demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.)
Coram: Rothstein / Cromwell / Moldaver
****
Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Stainton Ventures Ltd. (B.C.) (Civil) (By Leave) (36102)
Coram: Rothstein / Cromwell / Moldaver
****
DISMISSED WITHOUT COSTS / REJETÉES SANS DÉPENS
Emmet Quinn v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (36141)
Coram: Rothstein / Cromwell / Moldaver
****
Abdikarim Hilowle v. Her Majesty the Queen (Sask.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (36062)
(The respondent’s motion to file new affidavit evidence in response to the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed without costs. /
La requête de l’intimée en vue de déposer de nouveaux éléments de preuve par affidavit en réponse à la demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée sans dépens.
Coram: Rothstein / Cromwell / Moldaver
****
Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada :
comments-commentaires@scc-csc.ca
(613) 995-4330