Help

Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

Stony Mountain Institution v. Howard, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 687

 

The Attorney General of Canada                                                     Appellant

 

v.

 

Glen Howard    Respondent

 

indexed as: howard v. stony mountain institution inmate disciplinary court

 

File No.: 19327.

 

1987: December 9.

 

Present: Dickson C.J. and Beetz, Estey, McIntyre, Lamer, Wilson, Le Dain, La Forest and L'Heureux‑Dubé JJ.

 

on appeal from the federal court of appeal

 

                   Appeal ‑‑ Academic issue ‑‑ Appeal quashed.

 

                   APPEAL from a judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, [1984] 2 F.C. 642, 19 D.L.R. (4th) 502, 19 C.C.C. (3d) 195, 17 C.R.R. 5, 45 C.R. (3d) 242, 57 N.R. 280, allowing respondent's appeal from a judgment of the Trial Division (1983), 4 D.L.R. (4th) 147, 8 C.C.C. (3d) 557, 8 C.R.R. 301, dismissing respondent's application for prohibition. Appeal quashed.

 


                   Duff Friesen, Q.C., and Brian Hay, for the appellant.

                   Brian A. Crane, Q.C., and A. Peltz, for the respondent.

                   The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

1.                       The Chief Justice‑‑This appeal is moot by reason of three factors, two of which arose after leave to appeal was granted. The cumulative effect of these factors is such that the Court in its discretion quashes the appeal.

 

                   Judgment accordingly.

 

                   Solicitor for the appellant: Frank Iacobucci, Ottawa.

 

                   Solicitor for the respondent: Judy Elliott, Winnipeg.

 

Lexum

For 20 years now, the Lexum site has been the main public source for Supreme Court decisions.


>

Decisia

 

Efficient access to your decisions

Decisia is an online service for courts, boards and tribunals aiming to provide easy and professional access to their decisions from their own website.

Learn More