Applications for Leave

Decision Information

Decision Content

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. 36140     

 

 

March 26, 2015

 

Le 26 mars 2015

 

 

 

Coram:  McLachlin C.J. and Wagner and Gascon JJ.

 

Coram : La juge en chef McLachlin et les juges Wagner et Gascon

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

Alberta Securities Commission

Applicant

- and -

Gayle Marie Walton

Respondent

AND BETWEEN:

Alberta Securities Commission

Applicant

- and -

John Herbert Holtby

Respondent

AND BETWEEN:

Alberta Securities Commission

Applicant

- and -

Kenneth Michael Burdeyney

Respondent

AND BETWEEN:

Alberta Securities Commission

Applicant

- and -

Randall George Kowalchuk

Respondent

AND BETWEEN:

Alberta Securities Commission

Applicant

- and -

John Jacob Shepert

Respondent

 

ENTRE :

Alberta Securities Commission

Demanderesse

- et -

Gayle Marie Walton

Intimée

ET ENTRE :

Alberta Securities Commission

Demanderesse

- et -

John Herbert Holtby

Intimé

ET ENTRE :

Alberta Securities Commission

Demanderesse

- et -

Kenneth Michael Burdeyney

Intimé

ET ENTRE :

Alberta Securities Commission

Demanderesse

- et -

Randall George Kowalchuk

Intimé

ET ENTRE :

Alberta Securities Commission

Demanderesse

- et -

John Jacob Shepert

Intimé

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal of Alberta (Calgary), Numbers 1301-0201-AC, 1301-0207-AC, 1301-0209-AC, 1301-0210-AC, and 1301-0253-AC, 2014 ABCA 273, dated August 29, 2014, is dismissed with costs to the respondents Gayle Marie Walton, John Herbert Holtby, Kenneth Michael Burdeyney and John Jacob Shepert.

 

JUGEMENT

 

La demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d'appel de l’Alberta (Calgary), numéros 1301-0201-AC, 1301-0207-AC, 1301-0209-AC, 1301-0210-AC, et   1301-0253-AC, 2014 ABCA 273, daté du 29 août 2014, est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimés Gayle Marie Walton, John Herbert Holtby, Kenneth Michael Burdeyney et John Jacob Shepert.

 

 

 

C.J.C.

J.C.C.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.