| BETWEEN:
Camarin Limited
Applicant
- and -
Swiss Reinsurance Company, Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc., Aon Limited, Aon Global Risk Consultants Limited and Alexander Howden Limited
Respondents
AND BETWEEN:
Camarin Limited
Applicant
- and -
Swiss Reinsurance Company, Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc., Aon Limited, Aon Global Risk Consultants Limited and Alexander Howden Limited
Respondents |
|
ENTRE :
Camarin Limited
Demanderesse
- et -
Swiss Reinsurance Company, Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc., Aon Limited, Aon Global Risk Consultants Limited et Alexander Howden Limited
Intimées
ET ENTRE :
Camarin Limited
Demanderesse
- et -
Swiss Reinsurance Company, Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc., Aon Limited, Aon Global Risk Consultants Limited et Alexander Howden Limited
Intimées |
| JUDGMENT The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Numbers CA40100 and CA40112, 2016 BCCA 92, dated February 25, 2016, is dismissed with costs. The conditional application for leave to cross-appeal filed by the respondents, Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc., Aon Limited, Aon Global Risk Consultants Limited and Alexander Howden Limited, is dismissed without costs. |
|
JUGEMENT La demande d’autorisation d’appel de l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de la Colombie-Britannique (Vancouver), numéros CA40100 et CA40112, 2016 BCCA 92, daté du 25 février 2016, est rejetée avec dépens. La demande conditionnelle d’autorisation d’appel incident déposée par les intimées, Aon Reed Stenhouse Inc., Aon Limited, Aon Global Risk Consultants Limited et Alexander Howden Limited, est rejetée sans dépens. |