Advanced Search
- All Databases (102)
- Decisions (26)
- Resources (76)
26 result(s)
-
1.
Canada (Justice) v. Khadr - 2008 SCC 28 - [2008] 2 SCR 125 - 2008-05-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Evidence
Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, Canada (Justice) c. Khadr, 2008 SCC 28, 2008 CSC 28, 32147, [2008] 2 SCR 125, [2008] 2 RCS 125 [...] Citation: Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 125, 2008 SCC 28 [...] Indexed as: Canada (Justice) v. Khadr Neutral citation: 2008 SCC 28.
-
2.
Canada (Justice) v. Khadr - 2008 SCC 29 - [2008] 2 SCR 143 - 2008-05-23
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, Canada (Justice) c. Khadr, 2008 SCC 29, 2008 CSC 29, 32147, [2008] 2 SCR 143, [2008] 2 RCS 143 [...] Citation: Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 143, 2008 SCC 29 [...] Indexed as: Canada (Justice) v. Khadr Neutral citation: 2008 SCC 29.
-
3.
Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr - 2010 SCC 3 - [2010] 1 SCR 44 - 2010-01-29
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Courts
Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, Canada (Premier ministre) c. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, 2010 CSC 3, 33289, [2010] 1 SCR 44, [2010] 1 RCS 44 [...] Citation: Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44 [...] In 2008, this Court ordered the Canadian government to disclose to Mr. Khadr the transcripts of the interviews he had given to CSIS and DFAIT in Guantanamo Bay, under s. 7 of the Charter : Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, 2008 SCC 28, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 125 (“Khadr 2008”).
-
4.
Bowden Institution v. Khadr - 2015 SCC 26 - [2015] 2 SCR 325 - 2015-05-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsCriminal law
Bowden Institution v. Khadr, Établissement de Bowden c. Khadr, 2015 SCC 26, 2015 CSC 26, 36081, [2015] 2 SCR 325, [2015] 2 RCS 325 [...] Citation: Bowden Institution v. Khadr, 2015 SCC 26, [2015] 2 S.C.R. 325 [...] Indexed as: Bowden Institution v. Khadr 2015 SCC 26 File No.: 36081.
-
5.
Kelly Hartle, Warden of the Edmonton Institution, et al. v. Omar Ahmed Khadr - 2014-12-11
Applications for LeaveKelly Hartle, Warden of the Edmonton Institution, et al. v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, Kelly Hartle, directrice de l’Établissement d’Edmonton, et al. c. Omar Ahmed Khadr, 36081 [...] Omar Ahmed Khadr Respondent ENTRE : Kelly Hartle, Directrice de l’Établissement d’Edmonton et Procureur général du Canada [...] Omar Ahmed Khadr Intimé JUDGMENT The motion for a further stay of execution of the respondent’s transfer to a provincial correctional facility for adults, until the Court determines the appeal, is granted.
-
6.
Attorney General of Canada on behalf of the United States of America v. Abdullah Khadr - 2011-11-03
Applications for Leave - DismissedAttorney General of Canada on behalf of the United States of America v. Abdullah Khadr, Procureur général du Canada au nom des États-unis d’Amérique c. Abdullah Khadr, 34357 [...] Abdullah Khadr Respondent ENTRE : Procureur général du Canada au nom des États-unis d’Amérique [...] Abdullah Khadr Intimé JUDGMENT The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Number C52633, 2011 ONCA 358, dated May 6, 2011, is dismissed without costs.
-
7.
Prime Minister of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr - 2009-09-04
Applications for LeaveDirector of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, Prime Minister of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, 33289 [...] Omar Ahmed Khadr Respondent ENTRE : Premier ministre du Canada, Ministre des Affaires étrangères, Directeur du Service canadien du renseignement de sécurité et Commissaire de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada [...] Omar Ahmed Khadr Intimé JUDGMENT The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A‑208‑09, 2009 FCA 246, dated August 14, 2009, and the motion to stay the order of the Federal Court of Appeal and to expedite the hearing of the appeal are granted without costs.
-
8.
Minister of Justice, Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr - 2007-10-25
Applications for LeaveSecurity Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, Minister of Justice, Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, 32147 [...] Omar Ahmed Khadr Respondent ENTRE : Ministre de la Justice, Procureur général du Canada, Ministre des Affaires étrangères, Directeur du Service canadien du renseignement de sécurité et Commissaire de la Gendarmerie royale du Canada [...] Omar Ahmed Khadr Intimé JUDGMENT The application for leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, Number A‑184‑06, 2007 FCA 182, dated May 10, 2007, is granted.
-
9.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr - 2008 SCC 29 - [2008] 2 SCR 143 - 2008-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DIRECTOR OF THE CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE and COMMISSIONER OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE v. OMAR AHMED KHADR [...] [1] The respondent Khadr was apprehended by the American military in July 2002. [...] [21] L’intimé Khadr a été arrêté par l’armée américaine en juillet 2002.
-
10.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr - 2008-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, 32147 [...] MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DIRECTOR OF THE CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE and COMMISSIONER OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE v. OMAR AHMED KHADR
-
11.
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr - 2008-03-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsCivil procedure
Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, 32147 [...] MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, DIRECTOR OF THE CANADIAN SECURITY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE and COMMISSIONER OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE v. OMAR AHMED KHADR
-
12.
R. v. McGregor - 2023 SCC 4 - 2023-02-17
Supreme Court JudgmentsCurrie, John H. “Khadr’s Twist on Hape: Tortured Determinations of the Extraterritorial Reach of the Canadian Charter ” (2008), 46 Can. Y.B. Int’l L. 307. [...] This general rule is qualified by two exceptions: (1) consent by the foreign state to the application of Canadian law (para. 106); and (2) Canadian participation in a process that violates Canada’s international law obligations (paras. 51‐52 and 101; see also Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, 2008 SCC 28, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 125, at [...] ” (2008), 21 R.Q.D.I. 1; P.‐H. Verdier, “International Decisions: R. v. Hape” (2008), 102 Am. J. Int’l L. 143; J. H. Currie, “Khadr’s Twist on Hape: Tortured Determinations of the Extraterritorial Reach of the Canadian Charter ” (2008), 46 Can. Y.B. Int’l L. 307; M. L. Banda, “On the Water’s Edge?
-
13.
Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya - 2020 SCC 5 - [2020] 1 SCR 166 - 2020-02-28
Supreme Court Judgmentsclear violations of international law and fundamental human rights begin” (R. v. Hape, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 292, at para. 52; see also Tolofson v. Jensen, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022, at p. 1047; Canada (Justice) v. Khadr, [2008] 2 S.C.R. 125, at paras. 18 and 26; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 16). [...] Courts simply must recognize the limits of their institutional competence and the distinct roles of the judiciary vis-à-vis Parliament and the executive (Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at paras. 46-47). [...] [297] The executive is responsible for conducting international relations: Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 39.
-
14.
Ontario v. Criminal Lawyers’ Association of Ontario - 2013 SCC 43 - [2013] 3 SCR 3 - 2013-08-01
Supreme Court JudgmentsCourts
(Treasury Board) v. N.A.P.E., 2004 SCC 66, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 381; Canada (House of Commons) v. Vaid, 2005 SCC 30, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 667; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Re Residential Tenancies Act, 1979, [1981] 1 S.C.R. 714; Di Iorio v. Warden of the Montreal Jail, [1978] 1 S.C.R. 152; In re [...] they must give sufficient weight to the constitutional responsibilities of the legislative and executive branches, as in certain cases the other branch will be “better placed to make such decisions within a range of constitutional options” (Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 37). [...] 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3, at paras. 33-34 and 106-11; Newfoundland (Treasury Board) v. N.A.P.E., 2004 SCC 66, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 381, at paras. 104-5; Canada (House of Commons) v. Vaid, 2005 SCC 30, [2005] 1 S.C.R. 667, at para. 21; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at paras. 39-41.
-
15.
Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development) - 2016 SCC 12 - [2016] 1 SCR 99 - 2016-04-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
inhabitants of the Province of Quebec, [1939] S.C.R. 104; Attorney General of Canada v. Canard, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 170; referred to: Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Solosky v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821; Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 342; Lovelace v. Ontario, [...] [11] This Court most recently restated the applicable test for when a declaration should be granted in Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44.
-
16.
Canada (Attorney General) v. Bedford - 2013 SCC 72 - [2013] 3 SCR 1101 - 2013-12-20
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Courts
Burns, 2001 SCC 7, [2001] 1 S.C.R. 283; Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 SCC 1, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 3; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1993] 3 S.C.R. 519; New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community [...] [76] A sufficient causal connection standard does not require that the impugned government action or law be the only or the dominant cause of the prejudice suffered by the claimant, and is satisfied by a reasonable inference, drawn on a balance of probabilities (Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. [...] While I do not agree with the Court of Appeal that causation is not the appropriate lens for examining whether legislation — as opposed to the conduct of state actors — engages s. 7 security interests, its “practical and pragmatic” inquiry (para. 108) tracks the process followed in cases such as Blencoe and Khadr.
-
17.
Mikisew Cree First Nation v. Canada (Governor General in Council) - 2018 SCC 40 - [2018] 2 SCR 765 - 2018-10-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsYKCA 14, 358 D.L.R. (4th) 100; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Tsilhqot’in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC 44, [2014] 2 S.C.R. 257; Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, [1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010; Doré v. Barreau du Québec, 2012 SCC 12, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 395; R. v. Mercure, [1988] 1 S.C.R. 234. [...] Further, as this Court has previously held, declaratory relief may be an appropriate remedy even in situations where other forms of relief would be inconsistent with the separation of powers (see Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 2). [...] In the legislative context, a declaration allows courts to shape the legal framework while respecting the constitutional role of another branch of government to act within those constraints (Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at paras. 46-47).
-
18.
Doré v. Barreau du Québec - 2012 SCC 12 - [2012] 1 SCR 395 - 2012-03-22
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Professional law
and Immigration), 2002 SCC 2, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 72; Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 761; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Németh v. Canada (Justice), 2010 SCC 56, [2010] 3 S.C.R. 281; referred to: Catalyst Paper Corp. v. North Cowichan (District), [...] Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 SCC 2, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 72; Pinet; Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 761; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Criminal Lawyers’ Association; and Németh v. Canada (Justice), 2010 SCC 56, [2010] 3 S.C.R. 281.
-
19.
Shot Both Sides v. Canada - 2024 SCC 12 - 2024-04-12
Supreme Court JudgmentsAboriginal law
Constitutional law
2018 SCC 30, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 165; Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 99; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Solosky v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821; West Moberly First Nations v. British Columbia, 2020 BCCA 138, 37 B.C.L.R. (6th) [...] Courts have long relied on these criteria for assessing the availability of declaratory relief (see, e.g., S.A., at para. 60; Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 99, at para. 11; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 46).
-
20.
R. v. Conway - 2010 SCC 22 - [2010] 1 SCR 765 - 2010-06-11
Supreme Court JudgmentsAdministrative law
Constitutional law
Criminal law
v. Owen, 2003 SCC 33, [2003] 1 S.C.R. 779; Pinet v. St. Thomas Psychiatric Hospital, 2004 SCC 21, [2004] 1 S.C.R. 528; Doucet‑Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; R. v. Nasogaluak, 2010 SCC 6, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 206. [...] [103] Remedies granted to redress Charter wrongs are intended to meaningfully vindicate a claimant’s rights and freedoms (Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3, at para. 55; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 30).
-
21.
S.A. v. Metro Vancouver Housing Corp. - 2019 SCC 4 - [2019] 1 SCR 99 - 2019-01-25
Supreme Court Judgmentsv. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 99; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Operation Dismantle Inc. v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 441; Solosky v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821; Carter v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 5, [2015] 1 S.C.R. 331. [...] party has an interest in opposing the declaration being sought (Ewert v. Canada, 2018 SCC 30, [2018] 2 S.C.R. 165, at para. 81; see also Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 99, at para. 11; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 46).
-
22.
Kazemi Estate v. Islamic Republic of Iran - 2014 SCC 62 - [2014] 3 SCR 176 - 2014-10-10
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
v. Ecuador (2004), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 114; Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala (2002), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R. (Ser. C) No. 91; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; R. v. Malmo-Levine, 2003 SCC 74, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 571; Health Services and Support — Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. [...] As we stated in Bedford, “[a] sufficient causal connection standard does not require that the impugned government action or law be the only or the dominant cause of the prejudice suffered by the claimant” (para. 76; see also Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 21). [...] In this sense, there is no Charter free zone and the courts may have to play a part, as they have done in the past (Operation Dismantle Inc. v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 441; Khadr).
-
23.
Ewert v. Canada - 2018 SCC 30 - [2018] 2 SCR 165 - 2018-06-13
Supreme Court Judgments(Attorney General), 2013 SCC 14, [2013] 1 S.C.R. 623; Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 99; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; Solosky v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821; Ewert v. Canada (Attorney General), 2007 FC 13, 306 F.T.R. 234. [...] and where the respondent has an interest in opposing the declaration sought: see Daniels v. Canada (Indian Affairs and Northern Development), 2016 SCC 12, [2016] 1 S.C.R. 99, at para. 11; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at para. 46; Solosky v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 821, at pp. 830-33.
-
24.
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Harkat - 2014 SCC 37 - [2014] 2 SCR 33 - 2014-05-14
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Evidence
Immigration
3), [2009] UKHL 28, [2009] 3 All E.R. 643; Jaballah, Re, 2009 FC 279, 340 F.T.R. 43; Canada (Attorney General) v. Almalki, 2010 FC 1106, [2012] 2 F.C.R. 508; Khadr v. Canada (Attorney General), 2008 FC 549, 329 F.T.R. 80; Almrei, Re, 2009 FC 322, 342 F.T.R. 11; Smith v. Jones, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 455; R. v. L. (D.O.), [1993] [...] Courts have commented on the government’s tendency to exaggerate claims of national security confidentiality: Canada (Attorney General) v. Almalki, 2010 FC 1106, [2012] 2 F.C.R. 508, at para. 108; Khadr v. Canada (Attorney General), 2008 FC 549, 329 F.T.R. 80, at paras. 73-77 and 98; see generally C. Forcese, “Canada’s
-
25.
R. v. Kokopenace - 2015 SCC 28 - [2015] 2 SCR 398 - 2015-05-21
Supreme Court JudgmentsConstitutional law
Ipeelee, 2012 SCC 13, [2012] 1 S.C.R. 433; Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44; R. v. Regan, 2002 SCC 12, [2002] 1 S.C.R. 297; R. v. Babos, 2014 SCC 16, [2014] 1 S.C.R. 309; Canada (Minister of Citizenship [...] [291] Section 24(1) of the Charter grants courts a wide discretion to craft remedies that are “appropriate and just . . . in the circumstances”: see Doucet-Boudreau v. Nova Scotia (Minister of Education), 2003 SCC 62, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 3, at paras. 55-57; Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr, 2010 SCC 3, [2010] 1 S.C.R. 44, at