Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada
(le français suit)
JUDGMENTS IN LEAVE APPLICATIONS
January 24, 2019
For immediate release
OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar judgments in the following applications for leave to appeal.
JUGEMENTS SUR DEMANDES D’AUTORISATION
Le 24 janvier 2019
Pour diffusion immédiate
OTTAWA – La Cour suprême du Canada a déposé aujourd’hui auprès du registraire les jugements dans les demandes d’autorisation d’appel qui suivent.
DISMISSED / REJETÉES
Ronald Baldovi v. Her Majesty the Queen (Man.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (38144)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
La demande d’autorisation est rejetée.
****
Jasdeep Singh Warraich v. Her Majesty the Queen (Man.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (38160)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.
****
Chandeep Dhaliwal v. Her Majesty the Queen (Man.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (38277)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.
****
Duy Manh Le c. Agence du revenu du Québec (Qc) (Civile) (Autorisation) (38139)
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée sans dépens.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed without costs.
****
Alexander S. Clark v. Maurizio Pezzente, Toronto Dominion Bank, TD Canada Trust, TD Investment Services Inc. and TD Waterhouse Canada Inc. (Alta.) (Civil) (By Leave) (38161)
The miscellaneous motion is dismissed. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents, Toronto Dominion Bank, TD Canada Trust, TD Investment Services Inc. and TD Waterhouse Canada Inc.
La requête diverse est rejetée. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimées, Banque Toronto-Dominion, TD Canada Trust, Services d’investissement TD inc. et TD Waterhouse Canada Inc.
****
Amy Sparks and Brian Fish v. AARC Society (Alta.) (Civil) (By Leave) (38244)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Martin J. took no part in the judgment.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
La juge Martin n’a pas participé au jugement.
****
Cesare Fedele v. Her Majesty the Queen (Ont.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (37986)
The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the applicant’s right to file a motion for further directions with respect to the victim surcharges ordered by the Ontario Court of Justice, dated September 9, 2015, if said further directions are needed in light of the Court’s recent decision in R. v. Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58.
La requête en prorogation du délai de signification et de dépôt de la demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée sans préjudice du droit du demandeur de déposer une requête sollicitant des directives additionnelles à l’égard des suramendes compensatoires au profit des victimes d’actes criminels dont le paiement a été ordonné par la Cour de justice de l’Ontario, en date du 9 septembre 2015, si de telles directives sont nécessaires par suite de la récente décision de la Cour dans l’affaire R. c. Boudreault, 2018 CSC 58.
****
Stephen A. Hayhurst and Janice M. Hayhurst v. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada and Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Ontario (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (38201)
The motion for an extension of time to file the reply is granted. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La requête en prorogation du délai de dépôt de la réplique est accueillie. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
****
Norman Rotter v. Attorney General of Canada and Canada Post Corporation - and - Canadian Union of Postal Workers (F.C.) (Civil) (By Leave) (38138)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondent, Canada Post Corporation.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens en faveur de l’intimée, Société canadienne des postes.
****
Barbara Kueber v. Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie Medical Clinics Inc., Sayed Mostafa Amir Shourideh-Ziabari, Laurie Elizabeth Shaver, Angelo John Iocca, Heather Lynne Waterman, George Nicholas Karasmanis, Andrea Boyd May, Darren Jonathan Usher, David Boushy, Nazir Ahmad Malik, Triage Nurse J. Doe, County of Simcoe Paramedic Services and Paramedic J. Doe (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (38145)
The motion for an extension of time to serve and file the application for leave to appeal is granted. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La requête en prorogation du délai de signification et de dépôt de la demande d’autorisation d’appel est accueillie. La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
****
Her Majesty the Queen v. A.H. (N.S.) (Criminal) (By Leave) (38263)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée.
****
Manufacturers Life Insurance Company v. Lenard MacIvor (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (38169)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
****
Ville de Fermont c. Bloom Lake General Partner Limited, Quinto Mining Corporation, 8568391 Canada Limited, Cliffs Quebec Iron Mining ULC, Wabush Iron Co. Limited, Wabush Resources Inc., Bloom Lake Iron Ore Mine Limited Partnership, Bloom Lake Railway Company Limited, Wabush Mines, Arnaud Railway Company Limited, Wabush Lake Railway Company Limited, FTI Consulting Canada Inc. et Syndicat des Métallos, sections locales 6254 et 6285 (Qc) (Civile) (Autorisation) (38156)
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens en faveur des intimées, Bloom Lake General Partner Limited, Quinto Mining Corporation, 8568391 Canada Limited, Cliffs Quebec Iron Mining ULC, Wabush Iron Co. Limited, Wabush Resources Inc., Bloom Lake Iron Ore Mine Limited Partnership, Bloom Lake Railway Company Limited, Wabush Mines, Arnaud Railway Company Limited, Wabush Lake Railway Company Limited et FTI Consulting Canada Inc.
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs to the respondents, Bloom Lake General Partner Limited, Quinto Mining Corporation, 8568391 Canada Limited, Cliffs Quebec Iron Mining ULC, Wabush Iron Co. Limited, Wabush Resources Inc., Bloom Lake Iron Ore Mine Limited Partnership, Bloom Lake Railway Company Limited, Wabush Mines, Arnaud Railway Company Limited, Wabush Lake Railway Company Limited and FTI Consulting Canada Inc.
****
Steven Duane John Rivard v. Janine Therese Morris and Julianne Phyllis Rivard (Ont.) (Civil) (By Leave) (38086)
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
La demande d’autorisation d’appel est rejetée avec dépens.
Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada :
comments-commentaires@scc-csc.ca
(613) 995-4330