News Releases

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada

 

 

(Le français suit)

 

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT IN APPEALS

 

May 8, 2020

For immediate release

 

OTTAWA – The Supreme Court of Canada has today deposited with the Registrar the reasons for judgment in the following appeals. The reasons for judgment will be available shortly.

 

 

MOTIFS DE JUGEMENT SUR APPELS

 

Le 8 mai 2020

Pour diffusion immédiate

 

OTTAWA – La Cour suprême du Canada a déposé aujourd’hui auprès du registraire les motifs de jugement dans les appels suivants. Les motifs de jugement seront disponibles sous peu.

 


 

38594                    9354-9186 Québec inc. and 9354-9178 Québec inc. v. Callidus Capital Corporation, International Game Technology, Deloitte LLP, Luc Carignan, François Vigneault, Philippe Millette, Francis Proulx and François Pelletier - and - Ernst & Young Inc., IMF Bentham Limited (now known as Omni Bridgeway Limited), Bentham IMF Capital Limited (now known as Omni Bridgeway Capital (Canada) Limited), Insolvency Institute of Canada and Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals - AND BETWEEN - IMF Bentham Limited (now known as Omni Bridgeway Limited) and Bentham IMF Capital Limited (now known as Omni Bridgeway Capital (Canada) Limited) v. Callidus Capital Corporation, International Game Technology, Deloitte LLP, Luc Carignan, François Vigneault, Philippe Millette, Francis Proulx and François Pelletier- and - Ernst & Young Inc., 9354-9186 Québec inc., 9354-9178 Québec inc., Insolvency Institute of Canada and Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (Que.)

2020 SCC 10 / 2020 CSC 10

 

Coram:                  Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Rowe and Kasirer JJ.

 

REASONS RELEASED / MOTIFS DÉPOSÉS

 


 

 

 

Supreme Court of Canada / Cour suprême du Canada :

comments-commentaires@scc-csc.ca

(613) 995-4330

 

 

- 30 -

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.