Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

R. v. Mara Properties Ltd., [1996] 2 S.C.R. 161

 

Mara Properties Limited                                                                   Appellant

 

v.

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                   Respondent

 

Indexed as:  R. v.  Mara Properties Ltd.

 

File No.:   24684.

 

1996:   May 21.

 

Present:  La Forest, L’Heureux‑Dubé, Sopinka, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci and Major JJ.

 

on appeal from the federal court of appeal

 

                   Income Tax -- Non-capital loss -- Company disposing of trading asset acquired from subsidiary -- Whether property retained character as inventory.

 

                   APPEAL from a judgment of the Federal Court of Appeal, [1995] 2 F.C. 433, 95 D.T.C. 5168, [1995] 2 C.T.C. 86, 179 N.R. 363, allowing an appeal from a judgment of Kempo J.T.C.C., 93 D.T.C. 1449, [1993] 2 C.T.C. 3189.  Appeal allowed.

 

                   Warren J. A. Mitchell, Q.C., and Karen Sharlow, for the appellant.

 

                   Roger Taylor and Brent Paris, for the respondent.

 

                   The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

1                 La Forest J. -- We agree with the conclusion reached by the Tax Court and  McDonald J.A., the dissenting judge in the Court of Appeal,  [1995] 2 F.C. 433, 95 D.T.C. 5168, [1995] 2 C.T.C. 86, 179 N.R. 363.  In our view, in the circumstances of this case, the property retained its character as inventory in the hands of the appellant.

 

2                 Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with costs throughout, the judgment of the Court of Appeal is set aside, and the judgment of the Tax Court, 93 D.T.C. 1449,  [1993] 2 C.T.C. 3189, is restored.

 

                   Judgment accordingly.

 

                   Solicitors for the appellant:  Thorsteinssons, Vancouver. 

 

                   Solicitor for the respondent: The Department of Justice, Vancouver.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.