Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

Citation: R. v. Kernaz, 2019 SCC 48, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 640

 

Appeal Heard: October 18, 2019

Judgment Rendered: October 18, 2019

Docket: 38642

 

 

Between:

 

Nicholas Gregory Kernaz

Appellant

 

and

 

Her Majesty The Queen

Respondent

 

 

 

 

Coram: Abella, Moldaver, Rowe, Martin and Kasirer JJ.

 

Reasons for Judgment:

(para. 1)

Abella J. (Moldaver, Rowe, Martin and Kasirer JJ. concurring)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

R. v. Kernaz, 2019 SCC 48, [2019] 3 S.C.R. 640

 

 

 

Nicholas Gregory Kernaz                                                                              Appellant

v.

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                             Respondent

 

 

 

Indexed as: R. v. Kernaz

 

 

 

2019 SCC 48

 

 

 

File No.: 38642.

 

 

 

2019: October 18.

 

 

 

Present: Abella, Moldaver, Rowe, Martin and Kasirer JJ.

 

 

 

 

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for saskatchewan

 

                    Criminal law — Controlled drugs and substances — Possession of controlled substances for purpose of trafficking — Accused charged with possession of methamphetamine and cocaine for purpose of trafficking — Trial judge acquitting accused on trafficking charges but convicting accused of lesser included offence of simple possession — Court of Appeal finding trial judge applied wrong legal test as to possession for purpose of trafficking and entering conviction on trafficking charges — Conviction upheld.

 

 

                    APPEAL from a judgment of the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal (Caldwell, Schwann and Barrington-Foote JJ.A.), 2019 SKCA 37, 377 C.C.C. (3d) 150, 439 D.L.R. (4th) 92, [2019] 7 W.W.R. 101, [2019] S.J. No. 153 (QL), 2019 CarswellSask 199 (WL Can.), setting aside the accused’s acquittal for possession of methamphetamine and cocaine for the purpose of trafficking and entering a conviction. Appeal dismissed.

 

                    Thomas Hynes, for the appellant.

 

                    Wade McBride, Q.C., and Kevin Wilson, for the respondent.

 

                    The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

[1]                              Abella J. — The appeal is dismissed substantially for the reasons of the Court of Appeal.

                    Judgment accordingly.

 

                    Solicitors for the appellant: Gerrand Rath Johnson, Regina.

 

                    Solicitor for the respondent: Public Prosecution Service of Canada, Toronto.

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.