Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

  

 

SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

 

Citation: Michel v. Graydon*

Appeal Heard and Judgment Rendered: November 14, 2019

Reasons for Judgment: to follow

Docket: 38498

 

Between:

Danelle Michel

Appellant

 

and

 

Sean Graydon

Respondent

 

- and -

 

West Coast Legal Education and Action Fund Association

Intervener

 

Coram: Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown, Rowe, Martin and Kasirer JJ.

 

Judgment:

(paras. 1 to 2)

Wagner C.J. (Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown, Rowe, Martin and Kasirer JJ. concurring)

 

Counsel:

 

Peter M. Mennie and Michael Sobkin, for the appellant.

Ryan Dueckman, Karen Tiwana and Shawn Duguay, for the respondent.

Jennifer Klinck, Dustin Klaudt and Joshua Sealy-Harrington, for the intervener.

 

Note: This document is subject to editorial revision before its reproduction in final form in the Canada Supreme Court Reports.

 

* Neutral citation to follow.

 


 


No. 38498     

 

November 18, 2019

 

Le 18 novembre 2019

 

 

 

Coram:  Wagner C.J. and Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown, Rowe, Martin and Kasirer JJ.

 

Coram : Le juge en chef Wagner et les juges Abella, Moldaver, Karakatsanis, Côté, Brown, Rowe, Martin et Kasirer

 

 

 

BETWEEN:

Danelle Michel

Appellant

- and -

Sean Graydon

Respondent

- and -

West Coast Legal Education and Action Fund Association

Intervener

 

ENTRE :

Danelle Michel

Appelante

- et -

Sean Graydon

Intimé

- et -

West Coast Legal Education and Action Fund Association

Intervenante

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

The appeal from the judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia (Vancouver), Number CA44543, 2018 BCCA 449, dated November 30, 2018, was heard on November 14, 2019, and the Court on that day delivered the following judgment orally:

 

 

The Chief Justice — We are unanimous to reinstate the order of Judge G. Smith of the Provincial Court of British Columbia dated September 26, 2016.

 

 

Therefore, the appeal is allowed with costs throughout. Reasons to follow.

 

 

 

JUGEMENT

 

L’appel interjeté contre l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel de la Colombie-Britannique (Vancouver), numéro CA44543, 2018 BCCA 449, daté du 30 novembre 2018, a été entendu le 14 novembre 2019 et la Cour a prononcé oralement le même jour le jugement suivant :

 

[traduction]

Le juge en chef — Nous sommes unanimement d’avis de rétablir l’ordonnance du juge G. Smith de la Cour provinciale de la Colombie-Britannique datée du 26 septembre 2016.

 

En conséquence, l’appel est accueilli, avec dépens devant toutes les cours. Des motifs suivront.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

C.J.C.

J.C.C.

 

 

 

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.