Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Canada

Contract—Action against two defendants for price of goods sold and delivered—Question as to which defendant purchased—Findings of fact.

APPEALS by the defendant Wettlaufer Brothers Limited and by the plaintiff from the judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Ontario[1].

The plaintiff sued the defendants, Wettlaufer Bros., Ltd. and Snow Motors Inc., for the price of goods sold and delivered. The decisions turned upon findings of fact. At the trial Riddell J. held, upon the evidence, that, as to most of the items, the defendant Snow Motors Inc. was liable as being in fact the purchaser of the goods, and the plaintiff recovered judgment against it for $1,973.71, and against the defendant Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd., in respect of certain items, for $224.79, and against the defendants for costs. The defendant Snow Motors Inc. appealed from that judgment, and the plaintiff also appealed, claiming that it was entitled to judgment against the defendant Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd. for $2,198.50, and, in the event of success of the appeal of the defendant Snow Motors Inc., it was entitled to judgment against Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd. for $2,198.50. The Appellate Division1 allowed the

[Page 581]

appeal of the defendant Snow Motors Inc., and also allowed the plaintiff’s appeal, and directed that the action be dismissed as against the defendant Snow Motors Inc. and that the plaintiff recover from the defendant Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd., the sum of $2,198.50, and that the defendant Snow Motors Inc. and the plaintiff each recover its costs of action from the defendant Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd., and that the plaintiff recover from the defendant Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd. its costs of appeal, and that the defendant Snow Motors Inc. recover from the defendant Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd. its costs of appeal. The defendant Wettlaufer Bros. Ltd. appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada, and the plaintiff also appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada against the judgment of the Appellate Division in so far as it relieved the defendant Snow Motors Inc. from its liability to the plaintiff adjudged by the trial judge. Leave to appeal was granted to the appellants by the Appellate Division.

After hearing argument by counsel for all parties, judgment was reserved, and on the following day the Court orally delivered judgment allowing both appeals with costs.

Appeals allowed with costs.

R.S. Robertson K.C. for the defendant Wettlaufer Brothers Limited.

Gordon Waldron K.C. for the plaintiff.

L. Ramsey for the defendant Snow Motors Incorporated.

 



[1] [1927] 33 Ont. W.N. 199.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.