Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Canada

Negligence—Fall on stairway—Stairway built contrary to municipal by-law—Causal relation—Sufficient evidence—Appeal courts should not intervene—Civil Code, arts. 1053, 1054, 1055.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for Quebec[1], setting aside a judgment of the Superior Court condemning respondents to damages. Appeal allowed with costs.

J. Nuss, Q.C., and E. Drymer, for the appellant.

J. Vincent O’Donnell, Q.C., for the respondents.

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

RITCHIE J.—We are all of the opinion that there was evidence to support the findings of the learned trial judge and that the Court of Appeal was not justified in interfering with those findings.

The appeal is therefore allowed, the judgment of the Court of Appeal set aside and the judgment of the trial judge restored.

The appellant is entitled to her costs in this Court and in the Court of Appeal.

Appeal allowed with costs.

Solicitors for the appellant: Ahern, de Brabant, Nuss & Drymer, Montreal.

Solicitors for the respondents: Tansey, de Grandpré, Bergeron, Lavery, O’Donnell & Clark, Montreal.

 



[1] [1973] C.A. 474.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.