Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Canada

Compensation—Expropriation of land developer’s property—Large development planned by owner—Test for determining whether “special value” should be awarded as part of the compensation.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Court of Appeal for British Columbia[1] dismissing, subject to a variation, an appeal from a judgment of Munroe J., who on the application of each of the parties to set aside or remit the award of an arbitration board, remitted the award. Appeal dismissed.

D.W. Shaw, for the appellant.

J. Laxton and D. Maas, for the respondent.

The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

SPENCE J.—It is not necessary to hear further from you, Mr. Laxton and Mr. Maas. We are all of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed with costs. We are also of the opinion that the direction to the arbitrators in respect to the subject-matter of this appeal should be:

In order to receive any special value the onus is on Arpro to prove that its property, because of circumstances peculiar to Arpro, had more value to Arpro than it would have had to another competent and knowledgeable developer putting the property to similar use.

Judgment accordingly.

Solicitors for the appellant: Davis & Co., Vancouver.

Solicitors for the respondent: Laxton & Co., Vancouver.

 



[1] (1977), 5 B.C.L.R. 184.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.