Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

Supreme Court of Canada

Patent—Invalidity—No patentable invention—Golfing tees

APPEAL by the plaintiff from the judgment of the Exchequer Court of Canada (Audette J.)[1], dismissing its action for alleged infringement of its patent (for certain new and useful improvements in golfing tees) on the ground that the patent was invalid because of want of patentable invention.

At the conclusion of the argument for the appellant, and without calling on counsel for the respondent, the Court orally delivered judgment, dismissing the appeal with costs, on the ground that there was no patentable invention.

Appeal dismissed with costs.

R. S. Cassels K.C. for the appellant.

Russel S. Smart K.C. for the respondent.



[1] [1928] Ex. C.R. 13.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.