Help

Supreme Court Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

R. v. Huang, [1990] 2 S.C.R. 1105

 

Rong Ya Huang           Appellant

 

v.

 

Her Majesty The Queen                                                                   Respondent

 

Indexed as:  R. v. Huang

 

File No.:  21546.

 

1990:  October 3.

 


Present:  Wilson, La Forest, Sopinka, Gonthier and Stevenson JJ.

 

on appeal from the court of appeal for british columbia

 

                   Criminal law ‑‑ Corroboration ‑‑ Evidence ‑‑ Sexual assault causing bodily harm ‑‑ Complainant a minor ‑‑ Note written by complainant 45 minutes after incident not part of res gestae and therefore inadmissible ‑‑ Other evidence of sufficient confirmatory weight, including emotional state following assault ‑‑ Conviction affirmed.

 

                   APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (1989), 7 W.C.B. (2d) 427, dismissing an appeal from conviction by Campbell Co. Ct. J.  Appeal dismissed.

 

                   Richard Peck, Q.C., for the appellant.

 

                   Elizabeth Bennett, for the respondent.

 

                   The judgment of the Court was delivered orally by

 

                   Wilson J. ‑‑ The appeal is dismissed for the reasons given by the majority of the Court of Appeal.

 

                   Judgment accordingly.

 

                   Solicitors for the appellant:  Robertson, Peck, Thompson, Vancouver.

 

                   Solicitor for the respondent:  The Ministry of the Attorney General, Vancouver.

 

Lexum

For 20 years now, the Lexum site has been the main public source for Supreme Court decisions.


>

Decisia

 

Efficient access to your decisions

Decisia is an online service for courts, boards and tribunals aiming to provide easy and professional access to their decisions from their own website.

Learn More